Eligibility Myths?

In a recent email from Floyd Brown, the writer is suggesting obama’s “certificate of live birth” is not an authentic document, when attempting to prove an individuals citizenship at the time of their birth.

True?

Here’s the article:

Let’s Dispel Some Myths.

The Mainstream Media (MSM) has perpetuated a number of myths and provided a great deal of cover to Barack Hussein Obama on this issue.

Instead of looking into the facts, the MSM derisively dismisses those who simply want real and honest answers as “birthers” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Understandably, a lot of folks are confused. So let’s just examine the facts:

Section 1, Article 2 of the United States Constitution specifically states: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President….”

Barack Obama’s father was a subject of the British crown and, at the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was too young, to bestow her status as a natural born citizen unto her son. In order for Barack Obama to even make a credible claim that he might be eligible under Section 1, Article 2 of the United States Constitution to serve as President of the United States, he must be able to show that he was born in the United States.

Instead of supplying his actual birth certificate, to prove his eligibility, Team Obama, supplied an alternate document… a “Certification of Live Birth.” But the “Certification of Live Birth” is NOT an actual birth certificate. In fact, until very recently… only AFTER this controversy came to a head… the state of Hawaii did not even accept a “Certification of Live Birth” as singular proof that an individual was a Hawaiian citizen because Hawaii issued that document to individuals NOT actually born in Hawaii.

Bob Unruh with WorldNetDaily.com put it this way: “The ‘certification of live birth’ posted online and widely touted as ‘Obama’s birth certificate’ does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same ‘short-form’ document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true ‘long-form’ birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.”

With the above understanding in mind, when asked to release his actual birth certificate to clarify matters, Team Obama immediately went into OBSTRUCTION MODE. And, in fact, Team Obama has spent hundreds-of-thousands of dollars to OBSTRUCT requests that Obama supply his actual birth certificate.

Unruh again: “Obama’s actual response to those who question his eligibility to be president under the Constitution’s requirement that the U.S. president be a ‘natural born citizen’ has been to dispatch both private and tax-funded attorneys to prevent anyone from gaining access to his documentation.”

One can only ask why? … Why is Barack Obama actively REFUSING to produce his actual birth certificate? … What is Barack Obama trying to hide? … Why spend hundreds-of-thousands of dollars to obstruct requests to produce a document that Obama could obtain, upon request, for about 10-20 dollars?

Lt. Col. Lakin is asking that question… but instead of the courtesy of an answer… this officer, with 18 years of honorable military service, is being threatened with court-martial.

Something is rotten, but the stench isn’t coming from the Denmark… it’s coming from the White House.

Advertisements

Tags:

3 Responses to “Eligibility Myths?”

  1. ellenbarrons Says:

    You said: “The “Certification of Live Birth” is NOT an actual birth certificate.”

    Actually, it is. It is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and it is the only birth certificate that Hawaii currently sends out. Hawaii no longer sends out copies of the original birth certificate (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html).

    You also said: “In fact, until very recently… only AFTER this controversy came to a head… the state of Hawaii did not even accept a “Certification of Live Birth” as singular proof that an individual was a Hawaiian citizen because Hawaii issued that document to individuals NOT actually born in Hawaii.”

    Answer: Hawaii never issued that document or any birth certificate saying “born in Hawaii” on it unless there was proof that the child was born in Hawaii. Obama’s birth certificate says “born in Hawaii” on it, and the facts on that certificate were confirmed twice by the officials in Hawaii.

    The Wall Street Journal concluded: ““Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.”

  2. iproducerchris Says:

    Thanks for the reply @ellenbarrons.

    Even though I did not write this article, you offer a great argument, but with obama’s track record of misrepresenting the truth, I am much more inclined to believe that any document representing his supposed eligibility must be a forged document, unless it is supported by seriously irrefutable evidence. I have become so disillusioned by his incessant lying, I fear that I would not be capable of believing what he says “even if” hard evidence accompanied it. But the truth is: I do not consider the starbulletin, nor the wall street journal to be credible sources.

    Taking into consideration that his father was a subject of the British crown and, at the time of Obama’s birth, his mother was too young, to bestow her status as a natural born citizen unto her son I must confess, that it is unreasonable to accept that he has met the burden of proof and the facts point with absolute certainty, toward forgery, deceit, and a well orchestrated cover up.

  3. iproducerchris Says:

    This is where I stand: http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=7263

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: